[Bug libstdc++/33700] New: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[Bug libstdc++/33700] New: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v
3/src -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/opt/g
nu64/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/
-B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa64-hp
-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem /opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/include
-i
system /opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include -g -O2
-D_GLIBCX
X_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -O2 -g -O2
-DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++
-v3/include/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libst
dc++-v3/include -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/l
ibstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/te
st/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc
-pedantic-errors -S  -o all_pedantic_errors.s    (timeout = 600)
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/incl
ude/ext/bitmap_allocator.h:43,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:115:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
158:30: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
281:29: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:126:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:132:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:453:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:594:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/incl
ude/ext/bitmap_allocator.h:43,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:115:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
158:30: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
281:29: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:126:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:132:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:453:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:594:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant

FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/incl
ude/ext/bitmap_allocator.h:43,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:115:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
158:30: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/concurrence.h:
281:29: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:126:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:443:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/mt_allocator.h
:538:36: error: use of C99 long long integer constant
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/
all_pedantic_errors.cc:132:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:453:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope:594:33:
e
rror: use of C99 long long integer constant

extra_tool_flags are:
  -include bits/stdc++.h

#ifdef __LP64__
#define __MPOINTER              void    *m_ptr
#define __POINTER_SET           ((void *) 1LL)
#else
#define __MPOINTER              int     m_pad; \
                                void    *m_ptr
#define __POINTER_SET           0, ((void *) 1L)
#endif

struct pthread_mutex {
        short           m_short[2];
        int             m_int;
        int             m_int1[4];
                        __MPOINTER;
        int             m_int2[2];
        int             m_int3[4];
        short           m_short2[2];
        int             m_int4[5];
        int             m_int5[2];
};

The problem seems to be the define for __POINTER_SET which uses a
long long constant.


-- 
           Summary: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for
                    excess errors)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-10-08 18:57 -------
So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the
deadlock bug?


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dougkwan at google dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 19:32 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

> ------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-10-08 18:57 -------
> So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the
> deadlock bug?

Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between
128587 and 128594 in September.  The only patch of significance in this
period is Jason's 128590.  It's not obvious to me why this would have
affected the behavior of -pedantic.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dougkwan at google dot com]

------- Comment #3 from dougkwan at google dot com  2007-10-08 19:50 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite
before and did not see this problem.

-Doug

8 Oct 2007 19:32:42 -0000, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 19:32 -------
> Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
> errors)
>
> > ------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-10-08 18:57 -------
> > So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the
> > deadlock bug?
>
> Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between
> 128587 and 128594 in September.  The only patch of significance in this
> period is Jason's 128590.  It's not obvious to me why this would have
> affected the behavior of -pedantic.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 20:10 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

> That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite
> before and did not see this problem.

This is specific to LP64 hpux.

Did you test with 11.21 or 11.31?  Possibly, <sys/pthread.h> has been
updated.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dougkwan at google dot com]

------- Comment #5 from dougkwan at google dot com  2007-10-08 22:35 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

I only tested in Linux.

-Doug

8 Oct 2007 20:10:51 -0000, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 20:10 -------
> Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
> errors)
>
> > That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite
> > before and did not see this problem.
>
> This is specific to LP64 hpux.
>
> Did you test with 11.21 or 11.31?  Possibly, <sys/pthread.h> has been
> updated.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-08 23:01 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

> I only tested in Linux.

This was not introduced by your change.  The problem is the use of
an C99 extension (long long constant) in a system header.  I
believe that this wouldn't normally cause a warning, but gthr-posix.h
contains defines derived from defines in pthread.h (e.g., PTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT).

Probably, this can be fixed by fixing the HP header.  On the other
hand, maybe the warning/error shouldn't happen.  Possibly, the defines
in gthr-posix.h that reference pthread macros need __extension__
before the right-hand side.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2007-10-08 23:35 -------
Let's remove Doug from CC, then, and thank him for his prompt feedback...


-- 

pcarlini at suse dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|dougkwan at google dot com  |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca]

------- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2007-10-11 01:26 -------
Subject: Re:  FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess
errors)

> Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between
> 128587 and 128594 in September.  The only patch of significance in this
> period is Jason's 128590.  It's not obvious to me why this would have
> affected the behavior of -pedantic.

I should get my eyes checked ;(  The test has been failing since
introduction in r128500.

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug target/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-11 23:50 -------
Steve,

Does this bug also affect ia64-hpux?


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sje at cup dot hp dot com
          Component|libstdc++                   |target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug target/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-14 22:22 -------
Subject: Bug 33700

Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 14 22:22:25 2007
New Revision: 129304

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129304
Log:
        PR target/33700
        * inclhack.def (hpux11_pthread_const): New.
        * fixincl.x: Regenerate.
        * tests/base/sys/pthread.h: Update.


Modified:
    trunk/fixincludes/ChangeLog
    trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.x
    trunk/fixincludes/inclhack.def
    trunk/fixincludes/tests/base/sys/pthread.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700

[Bug target/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #11 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-14 22:25 -------
Fixed.


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700