From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26505 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2007 01:56:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26311 invoked by uid 48); 9 Oct 2007 01:55:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071009015558.26310.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/33704] AIX runs c++ constructors in incorrect order In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ajd at gentrack dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from ajd at gentrack dot com 2007-10-09 01:55 ------- Please reconsider. This is about initialization order between shared libraries. Not betweeen objects within a library. This works on atleast Linux, Windows, Solaris, HPUX, Tru64. The testcase throw_failure.cpp shows that libgcc/libstdc++ depend on this initialization order. So if the initialization order is really unspecified, then libgcc/libstdc++ have a bug. -- ajd at gentrack dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33704