public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/33669] [4.3 Regression]  Revision 128957 miscompiles 481.wrf
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071009153252.4188.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-33669-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #14 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2007-10-09 15:32 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression]  Revision 128957
 miscompiles 481.wrf

hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-09 14:00 -------
> Subject: Bug 33669
>
> Author: hjl
> Date: Tue Oct  9 14:00:11 2007
> New Revision: 129166
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129166
> Log:
> gcc/
>
> 2007-10-09  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
>
>         PR middle-end/33669
>         * ra-conflict.c (record_one_conflict_between_regnos,
>         set_conflicts_for_earlyclobber, global_conflicts): Improved
>         logging.
>         (global_conflicts): Removed incorrect check.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2007-10-09  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
>
>         PR middle-end/33669
>         * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c: New.
>
> Added:
>     trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33669.c
> Modified:
>     trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
>     trunk/gcc/ra-conflict.c
>     trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
>
>   
please back this out.  i have a different patch that i have finished
testing. this one is too conservative.

kenny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33669


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-09 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-05 14:49 [Bug rtl-optimization/33669] New: " hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-05 15:00 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/33669] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 21:17 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-05 21:49 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-05 21:52 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-05 23:14 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-06  2:07 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-06  2:31 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-06  4:12 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-06 16:17 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-07  3:18 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-07  9:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-07 11:36 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-07 21:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-08  3:53 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-08 20:18 ` seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
2007-10-09 14:00 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 15:33 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com [this message]
2007-10-09 15:41 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-09 16:19 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-10-10  3:33 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10  3:40 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-10  3:41 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-10-10  3:47 ` hjl at lucon dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071009153252.4188.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).