public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ajd at gentrack dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/33704] AIX runs c++ constructors in incorrect order
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071009200610.13940.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-33704-8038@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #13 from ajd at gentrack dot com  2007-10-09 20:06 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> A solution within GCC is very complicated.  

Have you looked at the suggested patch?
If you could point out any concerns/faults, I could have another try at it.

XLC has it's own solution implemented within the compiler / support libraries.
So it seems the loader behaviour only impacts gcc. It could be seen as a
deficiency in the gcc compiler / support libraries.

(In reply to comment #11)
> The problem *could* be solved in GCC, so it probably is worth retaining the PR.

Should I raise a separate PR for throw_failure.cpp?
I lumped them together because I figured it was the same root cause.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33704


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-09 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-09  1:46 [Bug target/33704] New: " ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  1:48 ` [Bug target/33704] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09  1:49 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  1:50 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  1:50 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  1:56 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  1:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09  2:43 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-09  3:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2007-10-09 12:50 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 14:54 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2007-10-09 15:08 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 15:18 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2007-10-09 20:06 ` ajd at gentrack dot com [this message]
2007-10-09 21:10 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 21:45 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-10  3:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10  4:04 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-12 12:56 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-14 21:39 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-18  0:48 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-19  1:44 ` ajd at gentrack dot com
2007-10-19  2:01 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-33704-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-11-23 15:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 12:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071009200610.13940.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).