public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
@ 2007-10-02 22:26 pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-03 0:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-02 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Hi. Likely due to the recent changes / extensions to the namespace association
mechanisms to accomodate the parallel STL, the legacy hashed containers are not
usable anymore in debug mode. Just compile with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG:
#include <ext/hash_map>
#include <ext/hash_set>
--
Summary: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pcarlini at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-03 0:37 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 23:07 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-03 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 00:37 -------
I'll take a look at this.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-10-03 00:37:10
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-03 0:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 23:07 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 23:08 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 23:07 -------
Here's my plan for the legacy hash containers:
1) port debug mode to tr1 associative containers
2) move ext/hash containers to deprecated
Thoughts?
Anyway.
This issue is a macro name mix-up. Here's I'll check in the attached fix
shortly.
best,
benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-03 0:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 23:07 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 23:08 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 9:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 23:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=14333)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14333&action=view)
EXT to EXT_D
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 23:08 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-10 9:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 15:24 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-10 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 09:19 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Here's my plan for the legacy hash containers:
>
> 1) port debug mode to tr1 associative containers
> 2) move ext/hash containers to deprecated
>
> Thoughts?
Certainly, I agree with the (mid term?) plan!
> Anyway.
>
> This issue is a macro name mix-up. Here's I'll check in the attached fix
> shortly.
... short term, however, seems a good idea manage to keep the ext facilities
working (well, our own testsuite infrastructure still uses the hash_*
containers and adding -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG to the testing switches broke testing
completely, that's how I actually noticed ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 9:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-10 15:24 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:49 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-10 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:24 -------
Subject: Bug 33633
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Oct 10 15:23:59 2007
New Revision: 129210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129210
Log:
2007-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/33633
* include/debug/hash_multimap.h: Change _GLIBCXX_EXT to _GLIBCXX_EXT_D.
* include/debug/hash_set.h: Same.
* include/debug/hash_multiset.h: Same.
* include/debug/hash_map.h: Same.
2007-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/parallel/losertree.h (loser_tree_traits_unguarded): To
loser_tree_unguarded_traits.
* include/parallel/multiway_merge.h (__gnu_parallel): Same.
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/hash_map.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/hash_multimap.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/hash_multiset.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/hash_set.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/parallel/losertree.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/parallel/multiway_merge.h
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 15:24 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-10 15:49 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:53 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-10 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:49 -------
Fixed.
Current debug mode results (ie, with make CXXFLAGS="-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" check)
FAIL: 20_util/pair/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/deque/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/bitset/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/deque/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/list/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/map/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/set/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/headers/vector/synopsis.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 23_containers/list/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/map/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/map/operators/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 210)
FAIL: 23_containers/map/operators/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 214)
FAIL: 23_containers/multimap/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/multiset/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/set/moveable.cc execution test
FAIL: 23_containers/set/operators/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 285)
FAIL: 23_containers/set/operators/1_neg.cc (test for errors, line 289)
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc (test for excess errors)
WARNING: 23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc compilation failed to
produce executable
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc (test for excess
errors)
WARNING: 23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc compilation failed
to produce executable
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/moveable.cc execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 25_algorithms/nth_element/2.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for
excess errors)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/erase_if.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/hash_illegal_resize.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/hash_mod.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/hash_shift_mask.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/example/ranged_hash.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_no_data_map_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/priority_queue_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_data_map_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_no_data_map_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/trie_data_map_rand.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/trie_no_data_map_rand.cc execution test
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5328
# of unexpected failures 33
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 57
# of unsupported tests 18
The pb_ds code fails are related to _GLIBCXX_DEBUG, but not debug-mode.
The "synopsis.cc" fails are actually testing something illegal: user-defined
forward declarations, so they can be ignored.
These are decent results, but not spectacular.
-benjamin
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 15:49 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-10 15:53 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 17:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-10 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 15:52 -------
Yes, time to fix the moveable.cc tests in debug-mode. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 15:53 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-10 17:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 17:56 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 17:57 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:36 -------
The moveable.cc fails are now fixed. Otherwise, a couple of fails are also
trivial
23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc
23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc
_S_word_size in the wrong namespace.
And
25_algorithms/nth_element/2.cc
it's just slow in debug-mode, succeeds after ~1 min for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 17:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-10 17:56 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 17:57 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-10 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:56 -------
Sweet, thanks. Any chance you could put in the
23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc
23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc
fix too? My sources are in pre-deprecate mode right now...
best,
benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-10 17:56 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-10 17:57 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-10 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:57 -------
I don't have a fix ;) Everything seems rather ugly and not worth the trouble...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-10 17:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-02 22:26 [Bug libstdc++/33633] New: -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_* pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-03 0:37 ` [Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 23:07 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 23:08 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 9:19 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 15:24 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:49 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:53 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 17:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-10 17:56 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 17:57 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).