From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12348 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2007 01:26:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12280 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2007 01:26:30 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071011012630.12279.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/33700] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg01074.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-11 01:26 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors) > Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between > 128587 and 128594 in September. The only patch of significance in this > period is Jason's 128590. It's not obvious to me why this would have > affected the behavior of -pedantic. I should get my eyes checked ;( The test has been failing since introduction in r128500. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700