From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21067 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 13:47:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 20967 invoked by uid 48); 12 Oct 2007 13:47:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071012134706.20965.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/33686] FORALL loop gives wrong result In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg01222.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-12 13:47 ------- > In the case where the FORALL only fills part of the array P, yes. If you mean, say "FORALL(I=2:3)", you are right! I overlooked this possibility. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33686