From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14208 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 15:28:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 14147 invoked by uid 48); 12 Oct 2007 15:28:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071012152800.14146.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/33638] [4.3 regression] wrong code with -O2 -fforce-addr In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manfred99 at gmx dot ch" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg01237.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #27 from manfred99 at gmx dot ch 2007-10-12 15:28 ------- With gcc of today (patched tree-ssa-forwprop.c to make it bootstrap): # gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gfortran-source/gcc/configure --enable-languages=fortran --disable-nls --disable-multilib --enable-checking=release --prefix=/usr/local/gfortran-test Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.0 20071012 (experimental) [trunk revision 129260] (GCC) The original program works fine now, the bugzilla testcase too, both with and without "-fforce-addr". I'm not able to trigger this wrong-code issue with this new version now. Note: the testcase gives different output, as meanwhile in gfortran the default precision for outputs has been increased. The actual values are the same though. Thanks a lot! -- manfred99 at gmx dot ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33638