* [Bug c++/26698] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
@ 2006-03-15 16:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-26 15:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 16:19 -------
Hmm, we used to get a warning in 3.2.3 and before:
t.cc:9: warning: conversion to a reference to the same type will never use a
type conversion operator
And it was rejected in 2.95.3:
t.cc:9: warning: conversion to a reference to the same type will never use a
type conversion operator
t.cc:9: warning: conversion to a reference to the same type will never use a
type conversion operator
t.cc: In method `X::operator X &() const':
t.cc:10: conversion from `const X' to `X &' discards qualifiers
t.cc: In function `int main()':
t.cc:23: conversion from `const X' to `X &' discards qualifiers
t.cc:15: in passing argument 1 of `add_one(X &)'
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
2006-03-15 16:19 ` [Bug c++/26698] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-26 15:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-09-16 1:48 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-05-26 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-05-26 15:37 -------
Confirmed. We should not be calling the conversion operator.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-26 15:37:05
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
2006-03-15 16:19 ` [Bug c++/26698] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-26 15:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2006-09-16 1:48 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
2006-09-16 21:14 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: lopezibanez at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-16 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 01:48 -------
When using -Wconverson:
pr26698.cpp:24: warning: conversion to a reference to the same type will never
use a type conversion operator
Maybe this warning should be reported always?
--
lopezibanez at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lopezibanez at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 1:48 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
@ 2006-09-16 21:14 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
2006-09-16 21:34 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: lopezibanez at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-16 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 21:14 -------
The change was made on revision 110567 on gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -9012,7 +9011,7 @@
}
if (what)
- warning (0, "conversion to %s%s will never use a type "
+ warning (OPT_Wconversion, "conversion to %s%s will never use a type
"
"conversion operator",
ref ? "a reference to " : "", what);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:14 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
@ 2006-09-16 21:34 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
2006-09-16 21:50 ` [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: lopezibanez at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-16 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-16 21:34 -------
Actually, it seems that the conditional on Wconversion was added before, at
revision 100541 by mmitchel (Notice the warn_conversion flag below).
@@ -8755,32 +8755,38 @@
if (operator_code == CALL_EXPR)
return;
- if (IDENTIFIER_TYPENAME_P (name) && ! DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl))
+ /* Warn about conversion operators that will never be used. */
+ if (IDENTIFIER_TYPENAME_P (name)
+ && ! DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl)
+ && warn_conversion
+ /* Warn only declaring the function; there is no need to
+ warn again about out-of-class definitions. */
+ && class_type == current_class_type)
{
tree t = TREE_TYPE (name);
- if (! friendp)
- {
- int ref = (TREE_CODE (t) == REFERENCE_TYPE);
- const char *what = 0;
+ int ref = (TREE_CODE (t) == REFERENCE_TYPE);
+ const char *what = 0;
- if (ref)
- t = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (t));
+ if (ref)
+ t = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (t));
- if (TREE_CODE (t) == VOID_TYPE)
- what = "void";
- else if (t == current_class_type)
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == VOID_TYPE)
+ what = "void";
+ else if (class_type)
+ {
+ if (t == class_type)
what = "the same type";
/* Don't force t to be complete here. */
else if (IS_AGGR_TYPE (t)
&& COMPLETE_TYPE_P (t)
- && DERIVED_FROM_P (t, current_class_type))
+ && DERIVED_FROM_P (t, class_type))
what = "a base class";
+ }
- if (what && warn_conversion)
- warning (0, "conversion to %s%s will never use a type "
- "conversion operator",
- ref ? "a reference to " : "", what);
- }
+ if (what)
+ warning (0, "conversion to %s%s will never use a type "
+ "conversion operator",
+ ref ? "a reference to " : "", what);
}
if (operator_code == COND_EXPR)
{
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:34 ` lopezibanez at gmail dot com
@ 2006-09-16 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 21:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-16 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |10915
Known to work| |2.95.3
Summary|g++ accepts const-incorrect |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] g++
|code due to conversion |accepts const-incorrect code
|function |due to conversion function
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:50 ` [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-20 21:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 16:25 ` [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-20 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-20 21:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-03 16:25 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 17:27 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-03 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:24 -------
Won't fix in GCC-4.0.x. Adjustine milestone.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-03 16:25 ` [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-03 17:27 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-03 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-03 17:27 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-07 0:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:10 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-07 0:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-09-07 0:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-09-07 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 657 bytes --]
------- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-07 00:34 -------
Now in mainline things are better:
26698.C: In member function X::operator X&() const:
26698.C:25: error: invalid initialization of reference of type X& from
expression of type const X
I'm not sure whether an error at line 28 is mandatory together with the above
one.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pcarlini at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-07 0:34 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-09-07 0:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-09-07 0:39 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-09-07 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-07 00:36 -------
Mark?
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-07 0:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-09-07 0:39 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-09-07 23:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-09-07 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-07 00:39 -------
Meant line *38* of course, sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-07 0:39 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-09-07 23:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-02 15:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-07 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-07 23:50 -------
It looks to me that the change I made in Comment #5 was just an optimization;
the warning was already conditionalized on warn_conversion. I just
short-circuited the checking sooner. Declaring the conversion function is not
illegal, so I think it's OK that we only warn conditionally.
It's true that we should never use the conversion function. The error we're
getting now is just a consequence of the body of the conversion function; if we
put "return *new X" in there, it would compile file, and we probably wouldn't
get an error about the program, even though it's still invalid.
So, I do think that there's a bug somewhere; we shouldn't be considering this
conversion operator when calling add_one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-07 23:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-02 15:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-07 19:50 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-10-02 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-02 15:47 -------
By the way, confirmed the "return *new X" point.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-02 15:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2007-10-07 19:50 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-10-12 18:43 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2007-10-07 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-07 19:50 -------
Subject: Bug number PR c++/26698
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00379.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-07 19:50 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2007-10-12 18:43 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-13 6:05 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-12 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 18:43 -------
Subject: Bug 26698
Author: simartin
Date: Fri Oct 12 18:43:33 2007
New Revision: 129274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129274
Log:
gcc/cp/
2007-10-12 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/26698
* call.c (build_user_type_conversion_1): Do not consider conversion
functions to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
cv-qualified) same object type (or a reference to it), to a (possibly
cv-qualified) base class of that type (or a reference to it).
gcc/testsuite/
2007-10-12 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/26698
* g++.dg/conversion/op4.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/op4.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/call.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-12 18:43 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-13 6:05 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-13 6:17 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-21 12:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-13 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 06:05 -------
Subject: Bug 26698
Author: simartin
Date: Sat Oct 13 06:04:57 2007
New Revision: 129282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129282
Log:
gcc/cp/
2007-10-13 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/26698
* call.c (build_user_type_conversion_1): Do not consider conversion
functions to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
cv-qualified) same object type (or a reference to it), to a (possibly
cv-qualified) base class of that type (or a reference to it).
gcc/testsuite/
2007-10-13 Simon Martin <simartin@users.sourceforge.net>
PR c++/26698
* g++.dg/conversion/op4.C: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/op4.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/cp/call.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-13 6:05 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-13 6:17 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-21 12:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-13 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 06:17 -------
Fixed on all the active branches.
--
simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26698] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function
2006-03-15 16:10 [Bug c++/26698] New: g++ accepts const-incorrect code due to conversion function jkherciueh at gmx dot net
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-13 6:17 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-21 12:06 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2008-08-21 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-21 12:04 -------
*** Bug 36430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gbrammer at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread