From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4659 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2007 08:31:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4600 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2007 08:30:48 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071016083048.4597.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/32580] iso_c_binding c_f_procpointer / procedure pointers In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg01467.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-10-16 08:30 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > SoC is over, I assume this has been put on ice ? > > Yes, there was unfortunately no patch before GCC entered stage 3 (12 September) > and in stage 3 merging new features is allowed. (Besides, there is not yet a > ready patch for procedure pointers.) > In any case, before GCC 4.4 enters stage 1, at least the core developers will > concentrate on fixing bugs. > Since adding c_f_procpointer might change the fortran runtime library, will this addition be OK for 4.4 ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580