From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9237 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2007 06:10:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9151 invoked by uid 48); 20 Oct 2007 06:10:25 -0000 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071020061025.9150.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/32889] [4.2 Regression] ICE in delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:7926 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tbm at cyrius dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg01763.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-10-20 06:10 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Would you do the following for the failing assert? > p debug_rtx (insn) > p debug_rtx (i1) > p debug_rtx (substed) Breakpoint 3, delete_output_reload (insn=0x2ab2d757c140, j=1, last_reload_reg=21) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.2/gcc/reload1.c:7932 7932 gcc_assert (!rtx_equal_p (XEXP (i1, 0), substed)); (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn) (insn 73 78 76 5 (set (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 1056 [0x420]))) 114 {addsi3} (nil) (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 1056 [0x420])) (nil))) $1 = void (gdb) p debug_rtx (i1) (expr_list:REG_EQUIV (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) (nil)) $2 = void (gdb) p debug_rtx (substed) (mem/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3) (const_int 17888 [0x45e0])) [19 S4 A32]) $3 = void (gdb) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889