public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/30285] gfortran excessive memory usage with COMMON blocks in modules Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:35:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20071022073532.4798.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-30285-6318@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #13 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-10-22 07:35 ------- I've adjusted the title slightly to refer to the use of COMMON blocks (in MPICH, OpenMPI) because the problem of .mod size excursion depends only on the "nesting depth", not on the actual size of the modules. I hope this bug will be fixed someday when somebody has a look either at the module writing routines or at the way the structures containing module information are held internally. I am unable to compile a reasonably large project (just in terms of the number of files, not total source code size!) using MPI. The problem appears even worse with OpenMPI than with MPICH. -- anlauf at gmx dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gfortran excessive memory |gfortran excessive memory |usage with large modules |usage with COMMON blocks in | |modules http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30285
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 7:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-12-24 0:26 [Bug fortran/30285] New: gfortran huge (excessive?) memory usage with large modules anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-12-24 0:28 ` [Bug fortran/30285] " anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-12-24 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/30285] gfortran excessive " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 1:50 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 9:35 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 11:10 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-02-02 21:44 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-02-02 22:37 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 4:42 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 13:05 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-04-13 18:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-20 2:41 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-20 19:56 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 7:35 ` anlauf at gmx dot de [this message] 2007-11-09 12:36 ` [Bug fortran/30285] gfortran excessive memory usage with COMMON blocks in modules fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 12:44 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2007-11-10 0:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 1:16 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2007-11-10 4:01 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-10 12:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 15:18 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-11-10 18:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 22:18 ` anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-11-12 5:55 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-17 13:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-17 13:49 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-30285-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2015-10-10 9:12 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20071022073532.4798.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).