public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:06:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20071025100541.14671.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-32921-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #37 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-25 10:05 ------- _gfortran_runtime_error is marked as no return which means virtual operations should not be on it. Sounds like noreturn should be the same as no vops (maybe). You have to take care about exceptions as no return functions can still change global state and "return" via an exception (or a long jump). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 10:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-07-28 0:23 [Bug tree-optimization/32921] New: " hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-28 0:32 ` [Bug tree-optimization/32921] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 0:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-28 1:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 10:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 20:51 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-28 20:59 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2007-07-28 23:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-11 11:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-07 15:17 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-07 15:17 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-07 15:19 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 17:48 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 16:14 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 16:19 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 17:41 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org 2007-10-17 21:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 20:55 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-19 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 12:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 12:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 16:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 22:13 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-20 4:21 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-20 9:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 16:05 ` hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 21:11 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-23 2:23 ` Joey dot ye at intel dot com 2007-10-23 20:29 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-23 20:31 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 12:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 15:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 15:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 15:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 23:15 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-25 8:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-25 10:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2007-10-25 11:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-25 11:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 16:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-23 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-23 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 18:50 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 20:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 21:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 22:36 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:27 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 12:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 12:33 ` dnovillo at google dot com 2008-05-02 12:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2008-05-02 14:16 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 15:06 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2008-06-06 14:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:04 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 15:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 14:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3 " bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-01-31 14:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 19:17 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20071025100541.14671.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).