public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/31608] wrong types in character array/scalar binop
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025204535.8659.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31608-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #47 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-25 20:45 -------
Subject: Re: wrong types in character array/scalar binop
On 25 Oct 2007 19:50:54 -0000, Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> I wonder why this name-mangling is necessary, it's not like these names
> are going to appear in the assembly, is it?
Those will not but other will like:
void f(void)
{
void g(void) {
}
g();
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31608
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 16:22 [Bug fortran/31608] New: wrong types in array transfer rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-17 16:27 ` [Bug fortran/31608] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-18 8:36 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-18 9:21 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-18 9:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-18 22:56 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-19 6:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-19 8:08 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-04-19 9:38 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-19 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-19 14:21 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-19 14:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-31 20:40 ` [Bug fortran/31608] wrong types in character array/scalar binop pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 10:40 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-10 23:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-11 8:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-07-11 8:52 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-07-11 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-11 10:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-11 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-11 10:25 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-10-03 8:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 17:41 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 21:59 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 22:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-06 21:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-10-07 12:49 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-08 8:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-10-10 7:06 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-10 15:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-10-11 5:17 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-11 10:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-10-12 17:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-12 20:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-10-20 4:22 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-10-20 9:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-20 9:36 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 2:31 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 2:39 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-25 6:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 15:41 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-25 15:48 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-10-25 16:01 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-10-25 18:03 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-25 18:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 19:51 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-10-25 20:45 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-10-25 20:45 ` pinskia at gmail dot com [this message]
2007-10-25 20:58 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-25 23:17 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-26 22:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-27 0:21 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-27 0:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-10-27 19:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-27 20:03 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-11-12 14:05 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-13 3:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-13 6:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-13 7:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-14 1:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 10:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-16 9:24 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-16 9:50 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-11-16 17:02 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-18 17:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-18 17:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-20 5:02 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-11-20 5:07 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025204535.8659.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).