From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2007 17:50:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13355 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2007 17:49:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071029174958.13354.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/33932] miscalculation of asm labels with -g3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg02598.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-29 17:49 ------- > Also, even if the asm code is put into > another section, why it cannot be called > from there? This section does not seem to have "a", so that's why... But its still nasty that the current section depends on the -g option and I fail to see anything in the docs that would make this code invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33932