public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/33713] [4.3 Regression] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm' Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:38:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20071106213845.7658.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-33713-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-11-06 21:38 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm' On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote: > I think P1 is a little too much since this requires -fforce-addr. I agree. This should be at most a P2. > c) disable flag_force_addr completely (doesn't require anything else, we might > still want to enable fwprop at -O?) > > My preference is c, b, a. Anybody else? c). I don't see a reason to not enable fwprop at -O, but I guess in this late stage I'd avoid it. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33713
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-06 21:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-10-09 15:02 [Bug middle-end/33713] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 16:50 ` [Bug middle-end/33713] " matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 17:41 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 6:44 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-10-22 8:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 2:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 17:06 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-06 21:38 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message] 2007-11-07 16:46 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-07 18:56 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-11-08 16:32 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2007-11-08 19:56 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-08 19:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-10 10:46 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 13:04 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-19 8:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 9:45 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-29 11:56 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 23:22 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20071106213845.7658.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).