From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12736 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2007 18:17:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 12653 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2007 18:16:57 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071109181657.12651.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/33775] Memset In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00817.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 18:16 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > IMO the proposed change would make the code more readable. Johan, the code you quote is in a file from the testsuite. Such code is used to test for some correct behavior under various circumstances. Therefore, there is typically a very good reason for the code to be written like that. Moreover, in the testsuite you will find not only unreadable code but also code that is broken on purpose to test that the compiler can handle such code. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33775