public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rask at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/21150] Suboptimal byte extraction from 64bits
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071109194812.26911.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-21150-1101@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #4 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 19:48 -------
I think this might be a middle-end issue related to PR 7061 or PR 15184. We're
doing slightly better with GCC 4.3.0 (because of subreg lowering, I guess), but
not much (asm output with -dp for readability):
a:
movl v+44, %eax # 53 *movsi_1/1 [length = 5]
movl v+8, %edx # 23 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
shrl $8, %eax # 54 *lshrsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
xorb v+36, %al # 11 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v, %al # 13 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+54, %al # 17 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+63, %al # 21 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
shrl $8, %edx # 24 *lshrsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
xorl %edx, %eax # 66 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
xorb v+18, %al # 29 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+27, %al # 33 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
ret # 69 return_internal [length = 1]
b:
pushl %ebx # 75 *pushsi2 [length = 1]
movl v+20, %edx # 69 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+12, %ebx # 67 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+8, %ecx # 66 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+16, %eax # 68 *movsi_1/1 [length = 5]
shrdl $8, %ebx, %ecx # 81 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
shrdl $16, %edx, %eax # 83 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
movl v+24, %edx # 71 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorl %ecx, %eax # 70 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movl v+28, %ecx # 72 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v, %al # 13 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
popl %ebx # 78 popsi1 [length = 1]
shrdl $24, %ecx, %edx # 85 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
xorl %edx, %eax # 73 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movl v+44, %edx # 53 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+36, %al # 21 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
shrl $8, %edx # 54 *lshrsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
xorl %edx, %eax # 74 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
xorb v+54, %al # 29 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+63, %al # 33 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
ret # 79 return_internal [length = 1]
c:
movzbl v+9, %eax # 7 *movqi_1/3 [length = 7]
xorb v+18, %al # 8 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v, %al # 9 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+27, %al # 10 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+36, %al # 11 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+45, %al # 12 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+54, %al # 13 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+63, %al # 14 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
ret # 33 return_internal [length = 1]
d:
pushl %ebx # 75 *pushsi2 [length = 1]
movl v+20, %edx # 69 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+12, %ebx # 67 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+8, %ecx # 66 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
movl v+16, %eax # 68 *movsi_1/1 [length = 5]
shrdl $8, %ebx, %ecx # 81 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
shrdl $16, %edx, %eax # 83 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
movl v+24, %edx # 71 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorl %ecx, %eax # 70 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movl v+28, %ecx # 72 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v, %al # 13 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
popl %ebx # 78 popsi1 [length = 1]
shrdl $24, %ecx, %edx # 85 x86_shrd_1/1 [length = 4]
xorl %edx, %eax # 73 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
movl v+44, %edx # 53 *movsi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+36, %al # 21 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
shrl $8, %edx # 54 *lshrsi3_1/1 [length = 3]
xorl %edx, %eax # 74 *xorsi_1/1 [length = 2]
xorb v+54, %al # 29 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
xorb v+63, %al # 33 *xorqi_1/1 [length = 6]
ret # 79 return_internal [length = 1]
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.0 20071102 (experimental)"
--
rask at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21150
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-09 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-21150-1101@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-11-09 19:48 ` rask at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2008-09-14 3:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-21150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-01-18 11:12 ` vda.linux at googlemail dot com
2021-07-25 0:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-04-21 13:10 [Bug rtl-optimization/21150] New: Suboptimal byte extraction from larger integers vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua
2005-04-21 13:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/21150] Suboptimal byte extraction from 64bits pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-24 13:26 ` vda at port dot imtp dot ilyichevsk dot odessa dot ua
2005-07-04 22:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071109194812.26911.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).