From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30030 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2007 00:00:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 29633 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2007 23:59:54 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071109235954.29632.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/30285] gfortran excessive memory usage with COMMON blocks in modules In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00859.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 23:59 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I wrote this code originally, and I agree with your analysis. But regtesting doesn't agree with my analysis... in case of common with bind(c,name="..."), this patch hampers the diagnosis of commons with the same name but different labels. I've tried hard to get it rolling that way, because I agree it's cleaner, but I couldn't. I'll propose a different approach (a hack, to avoid writing twice the same combination of name and binding label) to the list when it finishes regtesting. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30285