public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test @ 2007-09-29 18:48 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:00 ` [Bug target/33592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (6 more replies) 0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-29 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../ /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsui te/gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O0 -pedantic-errors -L/test/gnu/gc c/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-h p-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./lib iberty -lm -o ./array_constructor_11.exe (timeout = 300) PASS: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfort ran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu /gcc/objdir/gcc:.:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/ test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir /gcc Operating system error: Not a typewriter Out of memory FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O0 execution test Simplified test: ! Like array_constructor_6.f90, but check iterators with non-default stride, ! including combinations which lead to zero-length vectors. ! { dg-do run } program main implicit none call build (77) contains subroutine build (order) integer :: order, i, j ! Triggers compile-time iterator calculations in trans-array.c call test (1, 0, 3, (/ (i, i = 1, 0, 3), (i, i = order, 0, 1) /)) end subroutine build subroutine test (from, to, step, values) integer, dimension (:) :: values integer :: from, to, step, last, i last = 0 do i = from, to, step last = last + 1 if (values (last) .ne. i) call abort end do if (size (values, dim = 1) .ne. last) call abort end subroutine test end program main -- Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* GCC host triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* GCC target triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-29 19:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-29 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:00 ------- Operating system error: Not a typewriter Out of memory uhm, this doesn't make too much sense. Can you debug this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:00 ` [Bug target/33592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-29 20:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/33592] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-29 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:18 ------- realloc is called with a NULL pointer and 0 size. realloc (0, 0) returns NULL. This causes _gfortran_os_error to get called and the above error to get printed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:00 ` [Bug target/33592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-09 16:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:45 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-09 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:07 ------- My mistake. This comes from a typo in trans.c (a EQ_EXPR instead of an NE_EXPR). Could you test this patch? Index: trans.c =================================================================== --- trans.c (revision 129869) +++ trans.c (working copy) @@ -829,19 +829,19 @@ internal_realloc (void *mem, size_t size { if (size < 0) runtime_error ("Attempt to allocate a negative amount of memory."); - mem = realloc (mem, size); - if (!mem && size != 0) + res = realloc (mem, size); + if (!res && size != 0) _gfortran_os_error ("Out of memory"); if (size == 0) return NULL; - return mem; + return res; } */ tree gfc_call_realloc (stmtblock_t * block, tree mem, tree size) { - tree msg, res, negative, zero, null_result, tmp; + tree msg, res, negative, nonzero, zero, null_result, tmp; tree type = TREE_TYPE (mem); size = gfc_evaluate_now (size, block); @@ -868,10 +868,10 @@ gfc_call_realloc (stmtblock_t * block, t gfc_add_modify_expr (block, res, fold_convert (type, tmp)); null_result = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, res, build_int_cst (pvoid_type_node, 0)); - zero = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, size, - build_int_cst (size_type_node, 0)); + nonzero = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, size, + build_int_cst (size_type_node, 0)); null_result = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node, null_result, - zero); + nonzero); msg = gfc_build_addr_expr (pchar_type_node, gfc_build_cstring_const ("Out of memory")); tmp = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, void_type_node, null_result, @@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ gfc_call_realloc (stmtblock_t * block, t /* if (size == 0) then the result is NULL. */ tmp = fold_build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, type, res, build_int_cst (type, 0)); + zero = fold_build1 (TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, nonzero); tmp = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, void_type_node, zero, tmp, build_empty_stmt ()); gfc_add_expr_to_block (block, tmp); -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Component|target |fortran Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Known to fail| |4.3.0 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-09 16:07:17 date| | Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2007-11-09 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/33592] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-09 16:45 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10 17:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-11-09 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-09 16:45 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test > Could you test this patch? Yes, tonight. Thanks. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2007-11-09 16:45 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-11-10 17:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10 18:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-11-10 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10 17:49 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test > My mistake. This comes from a typo in trans.c (a EQ_EXPR instead of an > NE_EXPR). Could you test this patch? Works for me. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2007-11-10 17:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2007-11-10 18:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-10 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:02 ------- Subject: Bug 33592 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Nov 10 18:02:18 2007 New Revision: 130072 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130072 Log: PR fortran/33592 * trans.c (gfc_call_realloc): Fix the logic and rename variables. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/33592] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2007-11-10 18:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-10 18:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-10 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:04 ------- Problem fixed. Thanks for investigating this, Dave! -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33592 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-10 18:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-09-29 18:48 [Bug target/33592] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90 -O1 execution test danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 19:00 ` [Bug target/33592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:07 ` [Bug fortran/33592] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:45 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10 17:49 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-11-10 18:02 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 18:04 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).