From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2007 15:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 26109 invoked by uid 48); 13 Nov 2007 15:51:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071113155142.26105.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/34080] [4.3 regression] Transfer was working, now broken In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg01189.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 15:51 ------- I did not do proper regression tests, but it works using 4.3.0 20071016 (experimental) [trunk revision 129378] (SUSE Linux) which has presumably no Fortran patches applied. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Known to work| |4.2.1 4.1.3 Summary|[regression] Transfer was |[4.3 regression] Transfer |working, now broken |was working, now broken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34080