[Bug target/19750] [3.4] RTL checking failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[Bug target/19750] [3.4] RTL checking failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-31 14:14 -------
still fails with checking here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg01585.html


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |3.4.6


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19750

[Bug target/19750] [3.4] RTL checking failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-31 14:21 -------
Apparently fails without checking too:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg01501.html


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19750

[Bug target/19750] [3.4] failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-31 14:44 -------
Confirmed, checking merely gives us a more informative answer.  The compile
dies on the same line without checking too.  Without checking I get:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000073aeef in ix86_va_arg (valist=0x2aaaaac4b900, type=0x2aaaaac47820)
    at ../../egcc-3.4-SVN20051230/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:3331
3331              for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (container, 0); i++)
(gdb) p *container
$7 = {code = REG, mode = TImode, jump = 0, call = 0, unchanging = 0,
  volatil = 0, in_struct = 0, used = 0, integrated = 0, frame_related = 0,
  u = {fld = {{rtint = 0, rtuint = 0, rtstr = 0x0, rtx = 0x0, rtvec = 0x0,
        rttype = VOIDmode, rt_addr_diff_vec_flags = {min_align = 0,
          base_after_vec = 0, min_after_vec = 0, max_after_vec = 0,
          min_after_base = 0, max_after_base = 0, offset_unsigned = 0,
          scale = 0}, rt_cselib = 0x0, rtbit = 0x0, rttree = 0x0, bb = 0x0,
        rtmem = 0x0, rtreg = 0x0}}, hwint = {0}}}


With checking, I get:

titype-1.c: In function `foo':
titype-1.c:21: internal compiler error: RTL check: expected elt 0 type 'E' or
'V', have 'i' (rtx reg) in ix86_va_arg, at config/i386/i386.c:3331
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[...]
#4  0x00000000008f18dc in ix86_va_arg (valist=0x1, type=0x2aaaad1fd820)
    at ../../egcc-3.4-SVN20051230/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:3331
3331              for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (container, 0); i++)
(gdb) p *container
$1 = {code = REG, mode = TImode, jump = 0, call = 0, unchanging = 0, volatil =
0, in_struct = 0, used = 0, integrated = 0,
  frame_related = 0, u = {fld = {{rtint = 0, rtuint = 0,
        rtstr = 0xafafafaf00000000 <Address 0xafafafaf00000000 out of bounds>,
rtx = 0xafafafaf00000000,
        rtvec = 0xafafafaf00000000, rttype = VOIDmode, rt_addr_diff_vec_flags =
{min_align = 0, base_after_vec = 0,
          min_after_vec = 0, max_after_vec = 0, min_after_base = 0,
max_after_base = 0, offset_unsigned = 0, scale = 0},
        rt_cselib = 0xafafafaf00000000, rtbit = 0xafafafaf00000000, rttree =
0xafafafaf00000000, bb = 0xafafafaf00000000,
        rtmem = 0xafafafaf00000000, rtreg = 0xafafafaf00000000}}, hwint =
{-5787213829993660416}}}
(gdb)


-- 

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[3.4] RTL checking failure  |[3.4] failure in
                   |in gcc.dg/titype-1.c        |gcc.dg/titype-1.c


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19750

[Bug target/19750] [3.4] failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-14 02:29 -------
Kaveh, is this still valid?


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19750

[Bug target/19750] [3.4] failure in gcc.dg/titype-1.c

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-25 20:56 -------
This hasn't been seen since 4.0.0, closing as fixed.  (3.4 is no longer
maintained)


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19750