public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-02-23 11:04 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
  2006-02-23 13:39 ` aph at redhat dot com
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2006-02-23 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com  2006-02-23 11:04 -------
Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
LIBICONV
which is
LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.so
-Wl,-rpath -Wl,/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
in my case.

The second is
LTLIBICONV
which is
LTLIBICONV='-L/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -liconv
-R/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
in my case.

I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work.
So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
The following line:
*lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
%(libgcc) %(liborig)
 should be changed to
*lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
%(libgcc) %(liborig)

Any comments?

Rainer

P.S.: In the mean time I try to do a complete bootstrap and testsuite run


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-02-23 11:04 ` [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2006-02-23 13:39 ` aph at redhat dot com
  2006-02-23 14:46 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: aph at redhat dot com @ 2006-02-23 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from aph at redhat dot com  2006-02-23 13:38 -------
Subject: Re: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

Rainer Emrich writes:
 > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
 > LIBICONV
 > which is
 > LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.so
 > -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
 > in my case.
 > 
 > The second is
 > LTLIBICONV
 > which is
 > LTLIBICONV='-L/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -liconv
 > -R/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
 > in my case.
 > 
 > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work.
 > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
 > The following line:
 > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
 > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
 >  should be changed to
 > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
 > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
 > 
 > Any comments?

Looks right to me.  BTW, what failure caused you to find this?

Andrew.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-02-23 11:04 ` [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
  2006-02-23 13:39 ` aph at redhat dot com
@ 2006-02-23 14:46 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
  2006-02-23 15:41 ` aph at redhat dot com
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2006-02-23 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1831 bytes --]



------- Comment #9 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com  2006-02-23 14:45 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Haley schrieb:
> Rainer Emrich writes:
>  > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
>  > LIBICONV
>  > which is
>  > LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.so
>  > -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
>  > in my case.
>  > 
>  > The second is
>  > LTLIBICONV
>  > which is
>  > LTLIBICONV='-L/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -liconv
>  > -R/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
>  > in my case.
>  > 
>  > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work.
>  > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
>  > The following line:
>  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
>  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
>  >  should be changed to
>  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
>  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
>  > 
>  > Any comments?
> 
> Looks right to me.  BTW, what failure caused you to find this?
> 
> Andrew.
See the following messages:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00415.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00482.html

Rainer

- --
Rainer Emrich
TECOSIM GmbH
Im Eichsfeld 3
65428 Rüsselsheim

Phone: +49(0)6142/8272 12
Mobile: +49(0)163/56 949 20
Fax.:   +49(0)6142/8272 49
Web: www.tecosim.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD/cqY3s6elE6CYeURAotyAJ9rjAZSd2y1VN02UAHwcNvS4+YtQACdHPyZ
j7k/mmCAQ9I8NkS3VgLA8Jo=
=62eW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-23 14:46 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2006-02-23 15:41 ` aph at redhat dot com
  2006-02-23 16:17 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: aph at redhat dot com @ 2006-02-23 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com  2006-02-23 15:41 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

Rainer Emrich writes:
 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 > Hash: SHA1
 > 
 > Andrew Haley schrieb:
 > > Rainer Emrich writes:
 > >  > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
 > >  > LIBICONV
 > >  > which is
 > >  > LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.so
 > >  > -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
 > >  > in my case.
 > >  > 
 > >  > The second is
 > >  > LTLIBICONV
 > >  > which is
 > >  > LTLIBICONV='-L/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -liconv
 > >  > -R/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
 > >  > in my case.
 > >  > 
 > >  > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to
work.
 > >  > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
 > >  > The following line:
 > >  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@
@SYSTEMSPEC@
 > >  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
 > >  >  should be changed to
 > >  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@
@SYSTEMSPEC@
 > >  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
 > >  > 
 > >  > Any comments?
 > > 
 > > Looks right to me.  BTW, what failure caused you to find this?

 > See the following messages:
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00415.html
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00482.html

Yes, I agree with your reasoning.  AFAIK Mark Mitchell has to approve
this as it's for the release, but it's OK by me if it passes
bootstrap.

I don't see this problem on my system because LIBICONV and LTLIBICONV
are both null.  AFAIK that's because iconv is in libc.

Andrew.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-23 15:41 ` aph at redhat dot com
@ 2006-02-23 16:17 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
  2006-02-24  1:05 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2006-02-23 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com  2006-02-23 16:17 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

Andrew Haley schrieb:
> Rainer Emrich writes:
>  > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  > Hash: SHA1
>  > 
>  > Andrew Haley schrieb:
>  > > Rainer Emrich writes:
>  > >  > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv:
>  > >  > LIBICONV
>  > >  > which is
>  > >  > LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.so
>  > >  > -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
>  > >  > in my case.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > The second is
>  > >  > LTLIBICONV
>  > >  > which is
>  > >  > LTLIBICONV='-L/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -liconv
>  > >  > -R/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib'
>  > >  > in my case.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work.
>  > >  > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
>  > >  > The following line:
>  > >  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
>  > >  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
>  > >  >  should be changed to
>  > >  > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
>  > >  > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Any comments?
>  > > 
>  > > Looks right to me.  BTW, what failure caused you to find this?
> 
>  > See the following messages:
>  > 
>  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00415.html
>  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-02/msg00482.html
> 
> Yes, I agree with your reasoning.  AFAIK Mark Mitchell has to approve
> this as it's for the release, but it's OK by me if it passes
> bootstrap.
> 
> I don't see this problem on my system because LIBICONV and LTLIBICONV
> are both null.  AFAIK that's because iconv is in libc.
> 
> Andrew.

Bootstrap passed at my site for ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Testsuite run for libjaava gives:

                === libjava Summary ===

# of expected passes            4009
# of unexpected failures        1
# of expected failures          10
# of untested testcases         8

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-23 16:17 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2006-02-24  1:05 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-24 15:05 ` Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-24  1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-24 00:49 -------
It appears that the LT stands for libtool.  So the first one (LIBICONV) is
supposed to be used for linking if you aren't using libtool, and the second one
(LTLIBICONV) is used for linking if you are using libtool.  It is a happy
accident that libtool is using linker options, where the non-libtool one is
using gcc options.  Misusing libtool support this way probably isn't the best
possible solution, but it does look to me like it will work fine.

So, yes, this looks OK to me.  We could at least get this on mainline even if
we can't fix the release branches yet.


-- 

wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wilson at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-24  1:05 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-24 15:05 ` Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
  2006-02-25  8:15 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de @ 2006-02-24 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de  2006-02-24 14:57 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> It appears that the LT stands for libtool.  So the first one (LIBICONV) is
> supposed to be used for linking if you aren't using libtool, and the second one
> (LTLIBICONV) is used for linking if you are using libtool.

Right.  You cannot expect to be able to use $LTLIBICONV if you are not using
Libtool.

> So, yes, this looks OK to me.  We could at least get this on mainline even if
> we can't fix the release branches yet.

That is not ok.

Best would probably be if you took LIBICONV and killed all instances of
$wl aka $acl_cv_wl from it, and turned all remaining comma into spaces,
for good measure.  I think.  For the former, you could also call
AC_LIB_RPATH explicitly and unset or empty $wl for the AM_ICONV call, and
restore it afterwards.  If you don't need the LIBICONV for other purposes
that may involve linking with a compiler driver.

Or fix config/lib-link.m4 AC_LIB_RPATH to provide additional variables for
use when linking with $LD.  Luckily newer Libtool macros don't do that very
often anymore, so it may not be worth it.


-- 

Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx
                   |                            |dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-24 15:05 ` Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
@ 2006-02-25  8:15 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
  2007-11-14 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: shanwill44 at yahoo dot com @ 2006-02-25  8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from shanwill44 at yahoo dot com  2006-02-25 07:18 -------
 > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work.
 > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in.
 > The following line:
 > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
 > %(libgcc) %(liborig)
 >  should be changed to
 > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LTLIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@ @SYSTEMSPEC@
 > %(libgcc) %(liborig)

I am the original poster.
Make is succeeded after this fix on Solaris 9 (x86).
Thank yor for you support.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-25  8:15 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
@ 2007-11-14 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-11-14 23:17 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-14 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-14 23:04 -------
*** Bug 34097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tom_francen at midtechcorp
                   |                            |dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-11-14 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-14 23:17 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
  2007-11-14 23:46 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com @ 2007-11-14 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #16 from tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com  2007-11-14 23:16 -------

i'm receiving a very similar error under solaris 2.10, binutils and core utils
(latest versions), gnu make, etc.  gcc 4.1.2 built fine ... gcc 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
fail with the same error below ... 


/usr/bin/ksh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link /apps/tmp/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc -B/apps/tmp/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib/
-isystem /usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/include -isystem
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/sys-include
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava -g -O2   -o libgcj-tools.la -rpath
/usr/local/lib -rpath /usr/local/lib -version-info `grep -v '^#'
../../gcc-4.2.2/libjava/libtool-version`
classpath/tools/libgcj_tools_la-tools.lo  
 /apps/tmp/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/apps/tmp/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib/
-isystem /usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/include -isystem
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/sys-include -shared -nostdlib
/apps/tmp/./gcc/crti.o /usr/ccs/lib/values-Xa.o /apps/tmp/./gcc/crtbegin.o 
classpath/tools/.libs/libgcj_tools_la-tools.o 
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava -L/apps/tmp/./gcc
-L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin -L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib
-L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/../.. -lgcc_s -lgcc_s
-lc /apps/tmp/./gcc/crtend.o /apps/tmp/./gcc/crtn.o  -Wl,-soname
-Wl,libgcj-tools.so.8 -o .libs/libgcj-tools.so.8.0.0
(cd .libs && rm -f libgcj-tools.so.8 && ln -s libgcj-tools.so.8.0.0
libgcj-tools.so.8)
(cd .libs && rm -f libgcj-tools.so && ln -s libgcj-tools.so.8.0.0
libgcj-tools.so)
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ar rc .libs/libgcj-tools.a 
classpath/tools/libgcj_tools_la-tools.o
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ranlib .libs/libgcj-tools.a
creating libgcj-tools.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libgcj-tools.la && ln -s ../libgcj-tools.la libgcj-tools.la)
/usr/bin/ksh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=link /apps/tmp/gcc/gcj
-B/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava/ -B/apps/tmp/gcc/
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava -g -O2  -o jv-convert
--main=gnu.gcj.convert.Convert -rpath /usr/local/lib -shared-libgcc  
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava/.libs libgcj.la 
/apps/tmp/gcc/gcj -B/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava/ -B/apps/tmp/gcc/
-g -O2 -o .libs/jv-convert --main=gnu.gcj.convert.Convert -shared-libgcc 
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava/.libs ./.libs/libgcj.so
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -lpthread -lrt -ldl
-L/apps/tmp/./gcc -L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin
-L/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib
-L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib
-L/usr/ccs/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/../.. -lgcc_s -lgcc_s
-Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath'
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage
information
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [jv-convert] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/apps/tmp/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libjava'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/apps/tmp'
make: *** [all] Error 2


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-11-14 23:17 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
@ 2007-11-14 23:46 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
  2007-11-15 13:46 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: wilson at tuliptree dot org @ 2007-11-14 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #17 from wilson at tuliptree dot org  2007-11-14 23:46 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld
        correctly

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 23:16 +0000, tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
wrote:
> i'm receiving a very similar error under solaris 2.10, binutils and core utils
> (latest versions), gnu make, etc.  gcc 4.1.2 built fine ... gcc 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
> fail with the same error below ... 

You can try the workaround I gave in comment #6.

Jim


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-11-14 23:46 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
@ 2007-11-15 13:46 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
  2009-08-17 15:16 ` org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com
  2009-11-07 12:24 ` pierre42d at 9online dot fr
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com @ 2007-11-15 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #18 from tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com  2007-11-15 13:46 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly


thank you wilson ... i just tried suggestion #6 ... and it WORKED!!  thank you
very much!!

tjf
-------------------
Thomas James Francen
Midwest Technologies Corporation
http://www.midtechcorp.com - website

+1.303.898.6300 - Cell / Voicemail
+1.610.887.5155 - Fax

--- gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

From: "wilson at tuliptree dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: tom_francen@midtechcorp.com
Subject: [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
Date: 14 Nov 2007 23:46:07 -0000



------- Comment #17 from wilson at tuliptree dot org  2007-11-14 23:46 -------
Subject: Re:  gcj seems not to pass the option to ld
        correctly

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 23:16 +0000, tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
wrote:
> i'm receiving a very similar error under solaris 2.10, binutils and core utils
> (latest versions), gnu make, etc.  gcc 4.1.2 built fine ... gcc 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
> fail with the same error below ... 

You can try the workaround I gave in comment #6.

Jim


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-11-15 13:46 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
@ 2009-08-17 15:16 ` org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com
  2009-11-07 12:24 ` pierre42d at 9online dot fr
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com @ 2009-08-17 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #19 from org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com  2009-08-17 15:16 -------
I bumped into this issue with gcc-4.4.0 on x86_32 Linux, probably because I
have standalone libiconv installed


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-17 15:16 ` org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com
@ 2009-11-07 12:24 ` pierre42d at 9online dot fr
  13 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pierre42d at 9online dot fr @ 2009-11-07 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #20 from pierre42d at 9online dot fr  2009-11-07 12:24 -------
I have the same problem with 4.4.2


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-29 12:04 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-04  5:52 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-04  5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

--- Comment #24 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-04 05:52:01 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Fri Feb  4 05:51:57 2011
New Revision: 169822

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169822
Log:
Fix PR java/21206: Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath' for jv-convert

libjava/:
    PR java/21206
    * configure.ac (LDLIBICONV): New substituted variable, with
    instances of '-Wl,' removed from LIBICONV.
    * configure: Regenerate.
    * libgcj.spec.in: Use @LDLIBICONV@ not @LIBICONV@.
    * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
    * gcj/Makefile.in: Likewise.
    * include/Makefile.in: Likewise.
    * testsuite/Makefile.in: Likewise.

Modified:
    trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
    trunk/libjava/Makefile.in
    trunk/libjava/configure
    trunk/libjava/configure.ac
    trunk/libjava/gcj/Makefile.in
    trunk/libjava/include/Makefile.in
    trunk/libjava/libgcj.spec.in
    trunk/libjava/testsuite/Makefile.in


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-01-10 18:46 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-10 19:05 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-29 12:04 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-04  5:52 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-29 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #23 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-29 11:20:44 UTC ---
Proposed patch at: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02172.html>
Feedback appreciated.  Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-01-10 18:46 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-10 19:05 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-29 12:04 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-04  5:52 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-10 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2005-07-26 23:31:49         |2011-01-10
                 CC|                            |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to fail|                            |4.6.0

--- Comment #22 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-10 18:45:30 UTC ---
Reconfirming based on <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-01/msg00094.html>.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
       [not found] <bug-21206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-01-10 18:46 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-10 19:05 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-10 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bjg at gnu dot org

--- Comment #21 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-10 18:39:28 UTC ---
*** Bug 42524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-13 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-26 23:32 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-26 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-26 23:31 -------
I saw this problem on an x86-freebsd machine yesterday.

The problem is that $target/libjava/libgcj.spec has this
*lib: -lgcj -lm /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib 
%{!pthread: %{!shared: %eUnder this configuration, the user must provide
-pthread when linking.}}    %(libgcc) %(liborig)
This causes the strange ld error.

The underlying problem seems to be that I have a copy of libiconv in
/usr/local/lib.  The Makefile has this line
LIBICONV = /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib

libgcj.spec is built from libgcj.spec.in, which causes LIBICONV to be
substituted into the lib spec.  And now we have gcc options (-Wl) in a linker
spec (lib), which doesn't work.

I didn't look for a solution.  I just fixed it by hand.  When your libjava build
fails, edit the $target/libjava/libgcj.spec file to delete both spurious
instances of "-Wl,", continue the build, and this time it will finish successfully.

However, I did then get a lot of libjava failures, but I didn't care about them
at the time, so I ignored them.  I don't know if they are related to this issue,
or whether it was a temporary snapshot instability problem.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-07-26 23:31:49
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-13 19:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-13 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-26 23:32 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-13 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dish at csua dot berkeley
                   |                            |dot edu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-13 19:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-13 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-26 23:32 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-13 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-13 19:46 -------
Hmm, since this has now reported on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I have no idea what is going on.  The only 
thing I can think of is gcj is being miss compiled but I really doubt that since this also on sparc too.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-13 19:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-13 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-13 19:44 -------
*** Bug 22323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |john at karsner dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-04-26  0:11 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
@ 2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-13 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-13 19:43 -------
*** Bug 22468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aaronw at net dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
  2005-04-25 13:31 ` [Bug java/21206] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25 13:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-26  0:11 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
  2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: shanwill44 at yahoo dot com @ 2005-04-26  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From shanwill44 at yahoo dot com  2005-04-26 00:10 -------
Sure I also confirmed it working
on i686-pc-linux-gnu (SuSE 9.2).
So this must be specific to i386-pc-solaris2.9.

Thanks in advance. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
  2005-04-25 13:31 ` [Bug java/21206] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-25 13:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-26  0:11 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-25 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-25 13:29 -------
It passes correctly for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly
  2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
@ 2005-04-25 13:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25 13:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-25 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|bootstrap                   |java
           Keywords|                            |build


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-04  5:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-21206-10071@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-23 11:04 ` [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2006-02-23 13:39 ` aph at redhat dot com
2006-02-23 14:46 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2006-02-23 15:41 ` aph at redhat dot com
2006-02-23 16:17 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2006-02-24  1:05 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-24 15:05 ` Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
2006-02-25  8:15 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
2007-11-14 23:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-14 23:17 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
2007-11-14 23:46 ` wilson at tuliptree dot org
2007-11-15 13:46 ` tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
2009-08-17 15:16 ` org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com
2009-11-07 12:24 ` pierre42d at 9online dot fr
     [not found] <bug-21206-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-10 18:46 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-10 19:05 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-29 12:04 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-04  5:52 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-04-25  9:14 [Bug bootstrap/21206] New: " shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
2005-04-25 13:31 ` [Bug java/21206] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-25 13:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-26  0:11 ` shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-13 19:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-13 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 23:32 ` wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).