public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/21603] C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs
[not found] <bug-21603-332@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-11-15 17:05 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-15 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 17:05 -------
This is confirmed.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-15 17:05:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21603
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21603] C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs
[not found] <bug-21603-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-08-24 11:17 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-08-24 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21603
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-08-24 11:16:38 UTC ---
Mainline is now fine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21603] C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs
2005-05-16 2:17 [Bug c++/21603] New: " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-16 20:28 ` jason at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jason at redhat dot com @ 2005-05-16 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-05-16 20:28 -------
Subject: Re: New: C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs
On 16 May 2005 02:16:51 -0000, "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Steve Adamczyk has indicated that he feels that permitting dynamic allocation of
> VLAs is a mistake, in that, for example, you can't easily use the pointer
> outside the scope of the containing function, unless you somehow also pass/save
> the bounds.
Makes sense to me.
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21603
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-24 11:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-21603-332@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-11-15 17:05 ` [Bug c++/21603] C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-21603-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-08-24 11:17 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2005-05-16 2:17 [Bug c++/21603] New: " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-16 20:28 ` [Bug c++/21603] " jason at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).