From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5161 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2007 17:27:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5108 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2007 17:27:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071122172745.5107.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg02138.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #33 from stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-11-22 17:27 ------- > For -O0 expecting > int i = 1; > asm ("" :: "i" (i)); > to work is certainly bad assumption Btw, even the static const int i = 1; asm ("" :: "i" (i)); doesn't work with both -O0 and -O1. :( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200