From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22138 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2007 04:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 22086 invoked by uid 48); 25 Nov 2007 04:10:05 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071125041005.22085.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/30572] [4.3 Regression] target libraries links against /libgcc_s.1.dylib instead of $(prefix)/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fang at csl dot cornell dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg02367.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-11-25 04:10 ------- *nudge* (got patch?) Also, is there a "make installcheck" mechanism in place to automatically test installed builds? It wouldn't have to be very extensive, just enough to make sure each supported language at least compiles and links, which would catch installation breakages such as this. Just an idea. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30572