From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19106 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 16:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19063 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2007 16:37:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071127163754.19062.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34005] [4.3 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (expected an SSA_NAME object) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg02643.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-27 16:37 ------- I see. Though you probably shouldn't care about side effects in the first argument of COND_EXPR, that's going to be evaluated in any case. And for 2nd and 3rd argument wouldn't it for loop and vectorizer be sufficient to just test is_gimple_val? I.e. if (gimplify_ctxp->allow_rhs_cond_expr && is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 1)) && is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (*expr_p, 2))) return gimplify_pure_cond_expr (expr_p, pre_p); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34005