From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 20:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 1286 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2007 20:28:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071127202800.1285.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/33583] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_1.f90 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg02670.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-27 20:28 ------- OK, I've found the problem. tgammaf has not been added to gfortran.map. I suspect that there may be other symbols missing from gfortran.map. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about symbol versioning to determine if tgammaf needs to be just added or if it needs to be added on an as needed basis. This is probably a question for Janne? -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33583