From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23769 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 21:51:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 23703 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2007 21:51:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071127215130.23702.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/33583] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_1.f90 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg02683.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #21 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-27 21:51 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > OK, I've found the problem. tgammaf has not been added to > gfortran.map. Yuck. I should have remembered that :( > I don't know > enough about symbol versioning to determine if tgammaf > needs to be just added or if it needs to be added on an > as needed basis. It can be added unconditionnaly. (I asked Jane last time I added a fallback function.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33583