public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34265] Missed optimizations
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071129111621.15072.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-34265-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #22 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-11-29 11:16 -------
In top of the first two patches of comment #17, I have MOVED
+ NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_init);
+ NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli);
+ NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_done);
to the first suggested place. Now gfortran.dg/array_1.f90 pass the test, induct
is no longer unrolled/vectorized, but induct.v3 is: back to before the patch at
least on these quick tests.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-29 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 15:27 [Bug tree-optimization/34265] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 15:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34265] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 16:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 16:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 16:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 16:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 18:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 18:49 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 20:48 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 21:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 22:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 22:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-28 22:49 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 23:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 23:18 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-28 23:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 8:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-29 10:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 10:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 11:01 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 11:13 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-11-29 11:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message]
2007-11-29 12:25 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-29 15:49 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-11-30 21:38 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-12-03 14:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-12-03 14:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-12-03 14:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-12-03 14:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-12-03 16:30 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-12-03 18:59 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-12-04 6:57 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-04-23 21:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
[not found] <bug-34265-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-05-22 12:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-16 15:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-17 17:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-09-26 9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071129111621.15072.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).