From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-236975-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11566 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2007 07:17:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 11528 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2007 07:17:32 -0000
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:17:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20071130071731.11527.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-32086-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug target/32086] [4.3 Regression] 10% to 20% Performance Regression Between 4.1.3 and 4.3
In-Reply-To: <bug-32086-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg03012.txt.bz2



------- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2007-11-30 07:17 -------
So -fvect-cost-model is doing its job.  The vectorizations must not be
profitable, or are they?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32086