* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
@ 2007-11-29 12:02 ` vgodunko at rostel dot ru
2007-11-29 12:03 ` vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: vgodunko at rostel dot ru @ 2007-11-29 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from vgodunko at rostel dot ru 2007-11-29 12:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=14667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14667&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
2007-11-29 12:02 ` [Bug ada/34290] " vgodunko at rostel dot ru
@ 2007-11-29 12:03 ` vgodunko at rostel dot ru
2007-11-29 23:26 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: vgodunko at rostel dot ru @ 2007-11-29 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
vgodunko at rostel dot ru changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
2007-11-29 12:02 ` [Bug ada/34290] " vgodunko at rostel dot ru
2007-11-29 12:03 ` vgodunko at rostel dot ru
@ 2007-11-29 23:26 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-30 9:51 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-29 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 23:26 -------
Confirmed on SVN trunk
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.3.0 20071129 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_disp.adb:1111|
| Error detected at main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57 |
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-29 23:26:05
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-11-29 23:26 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-30 9:51 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-30 9:54 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-30 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 09:51 -------
As a workaround, it looks like you can use an explicit dereference instead of
an implicit one for the Set_Central_Widget call:
Main_Windows.Impl.Main_Window_Impl (Result.all)'Access.Set_Central_Widget
(Main_Windows.Impl.Main_Window_Impl (Result.all).Text_Edit);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-11-30 9:51 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-11-30 9:54 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-06 19:03 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-11-30 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 09:54 -------
Of course, you should read "reference" instead of "dereference" in the previous
comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-11-30 9:54 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-06 19:03 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-06 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-11-29 23:26:05 |2007-12-06 19:03:20
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-06 19:03 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-02 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-02 21:19 -------
Reconfirmed on SVN trunk
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.5.0 20090930 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure
exp_disp.adb:1363|
| Error detected at main_windows-constructors.adb:10:57 |
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2007-12-06 19:03:20 |2009-10-02 21:19:48
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/34290] Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call
2007-11-29 12:02 [Bug ada/34290] New: Problem with procedure visibility at the prefixed view call vgodunko at rostel dot ru
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-02 21:20 ` sam at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sam at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-02 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|sam at gcc dot gnu dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34290
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread