From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7276 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2007 10:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 7239 invoked by uid 48); 30 Nov 2007 10:59:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071130105933.7238.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/32086] [4.3 Regression] 10% to 20% Performance Regression Between 4.1.3 and 4.3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg03034.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-11-30 10:59 ------- Looking at http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/gcc-trunk/benchmark/gfortran-run.dat and http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/gcc-trunk/benchmark/gfortranVecCost-run.dat I think we should turn on cost model by default, at least for i386. Uros? -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-11-30 10:59:33 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32086