From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19944 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2007 21:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 19917 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2007 21:57:43 -0000 Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071208215743.19916.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/32972] performance of pack/unpack In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at verizon dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-12-08 21:57 ------- Subject: Re: performance of pack/unpack tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > we could make specific versions of all those intrinsic that > currently use memcpy(), including pack. > > Should we leave this bug open for this? > Yes. Is this related to the following: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-12/msg00051.html ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32972