public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and SJLJ exceptions
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071214200011.1268.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-34400-286@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #22 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 20:00 -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> I am confused about comment #20. Are these constraint failures caused by the
> proposed patch? are they independent of the patch? why is this related to the
> performance issues in doing SJLJ analysis?
I do not have the proposed patch applied. I only mentioned this because in
addition to the performance issue, there may also be a correctness issue. If
you think it is unrelated, I will file a separate PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34400
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-14 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-08 23:18 [Bug ada/34400] New: [4.3 regression] gnat1 takes too long to compile g-catiio.adb with " ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-08 23:30 ` [Bug middle-end/34400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-09 9:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-09 13:25 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-09 13:26 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-09 20:48 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-10 7:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 7:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 9:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 9:42 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 9:46 ` [Bug middle-end/34400] [4.3 regression] bad interaction between DF and " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 9:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 12:32 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 13:02 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-10 14:22 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 18:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 19:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-10 19:14 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-10 22:08 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-11 13:30 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-11 13:55 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-11 20:36 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-14 19:41 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-14 19:55 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-14 20:00 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-12-14 20:07 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-14 23:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-15 0:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 1:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 1:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 12:01 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 13:56 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-17 10:52 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-17 10:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-17 13:21 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-17 15:35 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-17 16:02 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-17 16:16 ` ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org
2007-12-17 16:34 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-17 16:55 ` stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
2007-12-17 19:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-19 13:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2007-12-19 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-19 23:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-20 1:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2007-12-20 6:15 ` stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
2008-01-02 23:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-02 23:34 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-04 11:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-01-04 11:17 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-01-10 19:19 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-17 21:05 ` spark at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-17 21:32 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-17 21:44 ` seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
2008-01-17 22:40 ` seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
2008-01-17 22:48 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-19 0:51 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 10:53 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-19 15:40 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-20 2:17 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-20 3:06 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-01-22 14:14 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-23 15:48 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071214200011.1268.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).