From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12799 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2008 23:21:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12441 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jan 2008 23:20:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080102232047.12440.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/32455] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with modified va_list In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:20 ------- This code isn't valid. We probably shouldn't allow declarations of __builtin_va_start, and we certainly shouldn't allow declarations that don't match the internal definition -- and I don't think that declaration does. (I'm not sure we should allow definitions of any __builtin functions; after all they're built-in!) -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32455