public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/34683] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080106102410.14576.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-34683-14773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-06 10:24 -------
> So, to sum up, the situation could be significantly improved by improving
> the FE.  (Like I noticed for I/O statements, where I provided a patch -
> that was not accepted - to share temporary variables created for the I/O
> context)

Could you add a link to that patch? I quickly searched my mail archive, but
could not find it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34683


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-06 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-05 23:51 [Bug tree-optimization/34683] New: compile-time problem with -fstrict-aliasing jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-06  0:37 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] " jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-06  0:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06  6:47 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-06  8:08 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-06  9:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 10:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 10:35 ` [Bug fortran/34683] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 11:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2008-01-06 11:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 11:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 12:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 12:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-06 22:15 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-06 22:24 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-01-06 22:24 ` [Bug middle-end/34683] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 14:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 15:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 15:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 16:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 16:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-07 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 10:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 13:56 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 16:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-08 21:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-09  1:09 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-09 10:32 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-09 10:32 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-01-09 10:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] [4.3 Regression] SSA rewriting in the loop unroller causes quadratic behavior steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 15:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 16:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 17:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 18:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 18:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 18:24 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-10 22:19 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-01-10 23:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-11 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-12  8:39 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080106102410.14576.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).