From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18185 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2008 10:39:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 18081 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2008 10:38:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080106103841.18080.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/34683] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 10:38 ------- This one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01762.html basically it mentiones async I/O as a reason to not do it, but instead the callee can copy the I/O structure in that case instead (it probably needs to anyway, as currently those structures live on the stack, so with async I/O you'd need otherwise to guarantee that the I/O finished before the current frame is left). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34683