From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9125 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2008 12:18:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 8904 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jan 2008 12:17:55 -0000 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080108121755.8903.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34683] [4.3 Regression] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #28 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:17 ------- Re. comment #26 More proof that assert checking _is_ expensive. I wonder how much compile time can be blamed overall on release checking (i.e. checking disabled vs. release checking). Have you ever compared e.g. build times of cc1-i files or a linux kernel with a non-checking compiler vs. a release-checking compiler? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34683