public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34683] [4.3 Regression] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:32:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080109094532.17004.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-34683-14773@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-09 09:45 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, jaydub66 at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #36 from jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-09 09:38 ------- > > > How does the trunk compare now to the numbers mentioned in comment #16 ? > > Compiling with rev. 131414 gives: > > -O1 -fstrict-aliasing: 33sec, 438197 kB > -O2: 97sec, 669637 kB > -O3: 50sec, 392669 kB > > This is of course better than a few days ago (thanks to Richard's patches). But > it's not even close to the numbers in comment #16. > > What worries me about this is not the 33sec compile time (I could live with > that, if I'd have to), but the really large amount of memory. On a machine with > only 256MB compiling takes several minutes, due to massive swapping. > > Richard: > You said that the remaining issue is probably not gonna be fixed for 4.3. I > don't quite see the reason for this, since this apparently *was* fixed at some > point in the 4.3 trunk (see comment 16). Yeah, but we won't trade wrong-code bugs for better compile-time here. I have no idea how practical it is to fix basic-block duplication code (which is the worst offender regarding compile-time in this circumstances of too many VOPs). > Also this would really be a shame since it would make GCC 4.3 practically > unusable for our project (http://gibuu.physik.uni-giessen.de/GiBUU/). There is a workaround available - you can use --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0 to disable SFTs, but this may disable useful optimization. This is the route we want to go with 4.4, addressing the missed optimizations in different ways. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34683
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 9:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-01-05 23:51 [Bug tree-optimization/34683] New: compile-time problem with -fstrict-aliasing jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-06 0:37 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] " jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-06 0:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 6:47 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-06 8:08 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-06 9:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 10:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 10:35 ` [Bug fortran/34683] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 11:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 11:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 11:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 12:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 12:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 22:15 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-06 22:24 ` [Bug middle-end/34683] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-06 22:24 ` [Bug fortran/34683] " rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-07 14:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] [4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 15:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 15:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 16:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 16:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 17:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 10:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:31 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:41 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 13:56 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 16:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-08 21:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-09 1:09 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-09 10:32 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message] 2008-01-09 10:32 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-09 10:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] [4.3 Regression] SSA rewriting in the loop unroller causes quadratic behavior steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 15:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 16:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 17:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 18:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 18:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34683] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 18:24 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-10 22:19 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-01-10 23:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 13:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-12 8:39 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080109094532.17004.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).