From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24563 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 08:18:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 24388 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jan 2008 08:17:27 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080111081727.24387.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/34737] missed optimization, foo(p); p++ is better then foo(p++) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "wvangulik at xs4all dot nl" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg01004.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from wvangulik at xs4all dot nl 2008-01-11 08:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=14920) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14920&action=view) Test case showing the three cases Compile using -fno-line. For the AVR I used: avr-gcc -Wall -Os -fno-inline -mmcu=avr5 --save-temps main.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34737