From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15805 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 11:33:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15650 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jan 2008 11:33:09 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080111113309.15649.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34737] Scheduling of post-modified function arguments is not good In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 11:33 ------- No what happened with 4.0 is rather DOM would prop x+1 for each x. Really this comes down to scheduling of instructions and moving them closer to their usage. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work|4.0.4 | Summary|Inefficient gimplification |Scheduling of post-modified |of post-modified function |function arguments is not |arguments, TER doesn't do |good |its work | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34737