public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34825] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with -funsafe-math-optimizations Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:19:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080117104506.7789.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-34825-15643@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 10:45 ------- So, we enter the recip pass with <bb 2>: if (x_2(D) == y_3(D)) goto <bb 3>; else goto <bb 4>; <bb 3>: D.1547_4 = x_2(D) / x_2(D); D.1548_5 = D.1547_4 * x_2(D); D.1545_6 = D.1548_5 / x_2(D); <bb 4>: # D.1545_1 = PHI <D.1545_6(3), 0.0(2)> return D.1545_1; that is, we compute x/x*x/x. Recip now 'optimizes' this to reciptmp.6_10 = 1.0e+0 / x_2(D); D.1547_4 = __builtin_pow (reciptmp.6_10, 2.0e+0); D.1548_5 = D.1547_4 * x_2(D); D.1545_6 = D.1548_5 * reciptmp.6_10; which is bogus anyway. But the ICE is gone :P Well, it registers the division x_2(D)/x_2(D) twice, which also makes it a wrong-code regression. The easiest thing is probably to just not do reciprocal optimization for x / x. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34825
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 10:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-01-17 7:20 [Bug c/34825] New: ICE (SIGSEGV) in compiling valid code " t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2008-01-17 10:00 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34825] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 10:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2008-01-17 11:27 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 12:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2008-01-17 12:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 13:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/34825] [4.2 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 17:03 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080117104506.7789.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).