From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20507 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2008 13:12:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20362 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2008 13:11:59 -0000 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080117131159.20361.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/24685] real(16) formatted input is broken for huge values (gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg01774.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #27 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 13:11 ------- > Add gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 to the summary as that test case points > here. But this is confusing, as demonstrated by... > It seems to fail also for s390-ibm-linux-gnu (for "test (1.0_kl, 0)") > and for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu (these are not yet XFAILED). XFAILed are > currently: > powerpc*-apple-darwin* *-*-freebsd* powerpc*-*-linux* > However, the target field of this PR shows: "sparc-solaris, powerpc-darwin". > Is sparc-solaris also affected or not? ...this. No, gfortran.dg/default_format_2.f90 doesn't fail on SPARC/Solaris. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24685