From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18715 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2008 02:00:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12646 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2008 02:00:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080121020006.12645.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/27177] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:474 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg02274.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 02:00 ------- Lawrence, thanks for looking into this. Was there any consensus on whether or not these are static_casts in this context? I'm guessing that the eventual resolution is going to be something like saying that a cast is a static_cast even if the class is incomplete, so long as the bases are known, but that such a static_cast can only be used in an un-evaluated context. Is that correct? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177