From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9713 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2008 14:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8942 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2008 14:54:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080121145433.8941.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/34483] wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal compiler error: in find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg02351.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #41 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-21 14:54 ------- Sorry I missed the second question: > The other question is whether the failing tests that should run *with* > profiling, like w_prof_gloval_var.c and w_prof_local_var.c, fail after > compilation with -fprofile-generate or after second compilation with > -fprofile-use. They failed with -fprofile-generate (BTW they fail without -fprofile-*). What I said in comment #38, is that I profiled the test(s) in 32 bit mode then compiled with -profile-use -m64 (I do not expect that to be right, but gcc did not complain about that). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34483