From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7260 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2008 18:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 7034 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2008 18:04:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080122180458.7033.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/34922] toplevel ./configure --help is incomplete In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg02606.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 18:04 ------- You should document this (awkward) flag in the --help output, though. Still, it is inconsistent to mention just a few of the possible arguments in the help text, thus my question: Should all toplevel libdirs be listed in the help text or should none of the toplevel libdirs be listed in the help text? If the latter, then let's please add a short note to the help text that mentiones these implied arguments, e.g. --without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no) where PACKAGE can be any toplevel lib directory except libgcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34922