From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19380 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 03:05:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 19004 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 03:04:23 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080123030423.19003.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/34931] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28796-[12].c (test for excess errors) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg02685.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-01-23 03:04 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr28796-[12].c (test for excess errors) > I don't think this is a regression, this is a new testcase for the branch. Yes, I missed the fact that the testcases are new. > There was most likely a forgot patch that should have been backported. For some reason, __builtin_finite() seems broken. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34931