From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32173 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 15:04:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31724 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 15:03:46 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080123150346.31723.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lucier at math dot purdue dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg02759.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #61 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-01-23 15:03 ------- Subject: Re: Inordinate compile times on large routines Kenny: Even after you backed out this latest patch the CPU usage was down (to 203 seconds from 280 seconds on my machine) and the maximum memory usage was down (to 7.3 GB from 10.2 GB). That's a big improvement. Brad -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854