From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28881 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2008 05:08:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 28526 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2008 05:07:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080127050742.28525.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/26099] support for type traits is not available In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg03302.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 05:07 ------- Hi Paolo, three of the tests you added for this enhancement have execute failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu on mainline when compiled with -fpic/-fPIC. Is there some valid reason they should not pass? These are the last pic-specific errors on mainline (that I haven't already patched) so I'd really like to zap them somehow. I imagine these failures are important since the audit trail talks a lot about using this feature in the std library which is compiled pic. Would you please take a look and let me know what you think needs to be done? Thanks. FAIL: g++.dg/ext/has_nothrow_assign.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/has_nothrow_constructor.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/ext/has_nothrow_copy.C execution test http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01322.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01290.html -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26099